Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add console output tracing

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 18:33 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:30 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 20:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Add a printk.console trace point to record any printk
> > > messages into the trace, regardless of the current
> > > console loglevel. This can help correlate (existing)
> > > printk debugging with other tracing.
> > > 
> > 
> > Looks like this patch got lost in the x-mas parade.
> > 
> > Is this the last version of the patch?
> > 
> > In the thread I also see:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by-me (Thomas Gleixner)
> 
> I don't think I made a newer version, in fact, I dropped it from my
> local tree already :)

Well, then, I'll add it to my current queue then. I'll include the above
acked-bys too if no one is against it. Speak now if you are! ;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/