Re: [PATCH 0/5] IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace enhancements

[Stanislav Kinsbursky]

13.02.2012 20:11, Serge Hallyn ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Quoting Stanislav Kinsbursky (skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > 10.02.2012 22:29, Casey Schaufler ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > > On 2/9/2012 10:01 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > > > This patch set aimed to provide additional functionality for all IPC objects,
> > > > which is required for migration these objects by user-space checkpoint/restore
> > > > utils.
> > > > The main problem here was impossibility to set up object id. This patch set
> > > > solves the problem in two steps:
> > > > 1) Makes it possible to create new object (shared memory, semaphores set or
> > > > messages queue) with ID, equal to passed key.
> > > > 2) Makes it possible to change existent object key.
> > >
> > > Is there any chance you might include the LSM data as well?
> >
> > Sorry, but I don't understand your question.
> > What is this "LSM"? Linux Shared Memory? If yes, and you mean SYSV
> > IPC SHM, then where do you want to include it?
>
> He means linux security modules.  (see include/linux/security.h)

Ok, thanks for explanation.
Casey, what exactly you are asking about? Am I going to implement 
security_*_set() functions?

--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/