Re: [PATCH RFC v2] slab: introduce kmalloc_array

[Xi Wang]

On Feb 11, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> But there is no misuse.
> 
> Both kaalloc(non-const, const) and kaalloc(const, non-const) are OK.
> It's just first case happens more often.

Any k*alloc(const, non-const) example?  I feel like in most cases
it is the caller code that should get fixed, such as:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/10/135

- xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/