[patch 83/86] zcache: fix deadlock condition

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Feb 10 2012 - 18:06:18 EST


3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9256a4789be3dae37d00924c03546ba7958ea5a3 upstream.

I discovered this deadlock condition awhile ago working on RAMster
but it affects zcache as well. The list spinlock must be
locked prior to the page spinlock and released after. As
a result, the page copy must also be done while the locks are held.

Applies to 3.2. Konrad, please push (via GregKH?)...
this is definitely a bug fix so need not be pushed during
a -rc0 window.

Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c
@@ -358,8 +358,8 @@ static struct zbud_hdr *zbud_create(uint
if (unlikely(zbpg == NULL))
goto out;
/* ok, have a page, now compress the data before taking locks */
- spin_lock(&zbpg->lock);
spin_lock(&zbud_budlists_spinlock);
+ spin_lock(&zbpg->lock);
list_add_tail(&zbpg->bud_list, &zbud_unbuddied[nchunks].list);
zbud_unbuddied[nchunks].count++;
zh = &zbpg->buddy[0];
@@ -389,12 +389,11 @@ init_zh:
zh->oid = *oid;
zh->pool_id = pool_id;
zh->client_id = client_id;
- /* can wait to copy the data until the list locks are dropped */
- spin_unlock(&zbud_budlists_spinlock);
-
to = zbud_data(zh, size);
memcpy(to, cdata, size);
spin_unlock(&zbpg->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&zbud_budlists_spinlock);
+
zbud_cumul_chunk_counts[nchunks]++;
atomic_inc(&zcache_zbud_curr_zpages);
zcache_zbud_cumul_zpages++;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/