Re: [PATCH] block: remove plugging at buffered write time

[Wu Fengguang]

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:30:27PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:06:35PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:02:24PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:27:19AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:01:44PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > > Buffered write(2) is not directly tied to IO, so it's not suitable to
> > > > > handle plug in generic_file_aio_write().
> > > > 
> > > > But generic_sync_write() does issue IO for O_SYNC writes, so unless
> > > > there is plugging at a lower layer in the writeback code then it
> > > > appears to me that plugging is still necessary (at least inside the
> > > > sync branch)....
> > > 
> > > Good catch! It looks that generic_write_sync() eventually calls into
> > > vfs_fsync_range() which further calls ->fsync(). We may add plugging
> > > around it:
> > 
> > 
> > NAK, please keep the plugging down in the fs, or the libraries used but
> > not common VFS code.
> 
> Please, what Christoph said.  At least for btrfs plugging here is wrong.

OK, I get the point: the fs knows best when to unplug. Since any
higher level plug nesting will turn such low level efforts into no-op,
it's highly undesirable to do it in the high level.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/