Re: integer overflows in kernel/relay.c

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Feb 09 2012 - 12:38:20 EST


On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:41:38 +0100 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/08/2012 11:25 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:34:16 +0100
> > Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/07/2012 03:11 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>> My static checker is warning about integer overflows in kernel/relay.c
> >>>
> >>> relay_create_buf()
> >>> 170
> >>> 171 buf->padding = kmalloc(chan->n_subbufs * sizeof(size_t *), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>> This can only overflow on 32bit systems.
> >>
> >> Correct
> >
> > This is a relatively common problem. Converting a kzalloc() call to
> > kcalloc() fixes it. But we do not have a non-zeroing version of
> > kcalloc().
> >
> > Please, someone complete this patch and send it to me!
> >
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/slab.h~a
> > +++ a/include/linux/slab.h
> > @@ -240,11 +240,16 @@ size_t ksize(const void *);
> > * for general use, and so are not documented here. For a full list of
> > * potential flags, always refer to linux/gfp.h.
> > */
> > -static inline void *kcalloc(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> > +static inline void *wtf_do_i_call_this(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>
> kzcalloc()? Either that, or long_and_verbose().

I would need to be k_not_z_calloc() because it's the non-zeroing version.

kcallocn()? knalloc()? kncalloc()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/