Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameterfunc

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:30:51 +0100
"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  	} while (0)
> > +/*
> > + * Preemption is disabled here to make sure the
> > + * cond_func is called under the same condtions in UP
> > + * and SMP.
> > + */
> > +#define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags) \
> > +	do {						\
> 
> How about:
> 
> 		void *__info = (info);
> 
> as to avoid double execution.

Yup.  How does this look?


From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix

- avoid double-evaluation of `info' (per Michal)
- parenthesise evaluation of `cond_func'

Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/smp.h |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/smp.h~smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix
+++ a/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -168,10 +168,11 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(s
  */
 #define on_each_cpu_cond(cond_func, func, info, wait, gfp_flags)\
 	do {							\
+		void *__info = (info);				\
 		preempt_disable();				\
-		if (cond_func(0, info)) {			\
+		if ((cond_func)(0, __info)) {			\
 			local_irq_disable();			\
-			(func)(info);				\
+			(func)(__info);				\
 			local_irq_enable();			\
 		}						\
 		preempt_enable();				\
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/