Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/07, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:32PM -0500, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > Some __cond_lock() caller are inline functions. Is this bad?
>
> No, that's great, actually. :-) Not obvious, but seems like
> sparse understands __cond_lock in inline functions, so I'd
> better use it.

Hmm, great...

may be you can update lock_task_sighand() too ? (in a separate
patch of course).

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/