Re: Bad SSD performance with recent kernels

[Wu Fengguang]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 02:13:51PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 29 janvier 2012 Ã 19:16 +0800, Wu Fengguang a Ãcrit :
> 
> 
> > Note that as long as buffered read(2) is used, it makes almost no
> > difference (well, at least for now) to do "dd bs=128k" or "dd bs=2MB":
> > the 128kb readahead size will be used underneath to submit read IO.
> > 
> 
> Hmm...
> 
> # echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=128k count=32768
> 32768+0 enregistrements lus
> 32768+0 enregistrements Ãcrits
> 4294967296 octets (4,3 GB) copiÃs, 20,7718 s, 207 MB/s
> 
> 
> # echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=2M count=2048
> 2048+0 enregistrements lus
> 2048+0 enregistrements Ãcrits
> 4294967296 octets (4,3 GB) copiÃs, 27,7824 s, 155 MB/s

Interesting. Here are my test results:

root@lkp-nex04 /home/wfg# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=128k count=32768
32768+0 records in
32768+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 19.0121 s, 226 MB/s
root@lkp-nex04 /home/wfg# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=2M count=2048
2048+0 records in
2048+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 19.0214 s, 226 MB/s

Maybe the /dev/sda performance bug on your machine is sensitive to timing?

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/