Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming)
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Tue Jan 24 2012 - 16:09:37 EST
> Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check
> tomorrow with colleagues.
Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for
your board, others could test with their boards.
> I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers
> currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific
> tree I should update from?
You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a
lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and
can be extended once the drivers are in place.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature