Re: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family

From: Nicolas Ferre
Date: Fri Jan 13 2012 - 06:11:27 EST


On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre :
> Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be
> difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and
> remove LOC during current cleanup process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Hi Andrew, Greg,

Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file?

It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also:

Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Or tell me to resend a complete patch.

Thanks for your help, best regards,


> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5
> Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around
> for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped.
> Who: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +----------------------------
> +
> +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed
> +When: 3.4
> +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
> + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c
> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h
> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h
> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h
> + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c
> +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find.
> +Who: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/