Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF
From: Will Drewry
Date: Thu Jan 12 2012 - 11:54:26 EST
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Serge Hallyn
<serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Will Drewry (wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
>> This patch adds support for seccomp mode 2. This mode enables dynamic
>> enforcement of system call filtering policy in the kernel as specified
>> by a userland task. The policy is expressed in terms of a BPF program,
>> as is used for userland-exposed socket filtering. Instead of network
>> data, the BPF program is evaluated over struct user_regs_struct at the
>> time of the system call (as retrieved using regviews).
>>
>> A filter program may be installed by a userland task by calling
>> prctl(PR_ATTACH_SECCOMP_FILTER, &fprog);
>> where fprog is of type struct sock_fprog.
>>
>> If the first filter program allows subsequent prctl(2) calls, then
>> additional filter programs may be attached. All attached programs
>> must be evaluated before a system call will be allowed to proceed.
>>
>> To avoid CONFIG_COMPAT related landmines, once a filter program is
>> installed using specific is_compat_task() and current->personality, it
>> is not allowed to make system calls or attach additional filters which
>> use a different combination of is_compat_task() and
>> current->personality.
>>
>> Filter programs may _only_ cross the execve(2) barrier if last filter
>> program was attached by a task with CAP_SYS_ADMIN capabilities in its
>> user namespace. Once a task-local filter program is attached from a
>> process without privileges, execve will fail. This ensures that only
>> privileged parent task can affect its privileged children (e.g., setuid
>> binary).
>>
>> There are a number of benefits to this approach. A few of which are
>> as follows:
>> - BPF has been exposed to userland for a long time.
>> - Userland already knows its ABI: expected register layout and system
>> call numbers.
>> - Full register information is provided which may be relevant for
>> certain syscalls (fork, rt_sigreturn) or for other userland
>> filtering tactics (checking the PC).
>> - No time-of-check-time-of-use vulnerable data accesses are possible.
>>
>> This patch includes its own BPF evaluator, but relies on the
>> net/core/filter.c BPF checking code. It is possible to share
>> evaluators, but the performance sensitive nature of the network
>> filtering path makes it an iterative optimization which (I think :) can
>> be tackled separately via separate patchsets. (And at some point sharing
>> BPF JIT code!)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hey Will,
>
> A few comments below, but otherwise
>
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks! Unimportant responses below. Fixes will be incorporated in
the next round (along with Oleg's feedback).
cheers,
will
> thanks,
> -serge
>
>> ---
>> fs/exec.c | 5 +
>> include/linux/prctl.h | 3 +
>> include/linux/seccomp.h | 70 +++++-
>> kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>> kernel/fork.c | 4 +
>> kernel/seccomp.c | 8 +
>> kernel/seccomp_filter.c | 639 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> kernel/sys.c | 4 +
>> security/Kconfig | 12 +
>> 9 files changed, 743 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 kernel/seccomp_filter.c
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
>> index 3625464..e9cc89c 100644
>> --- a/fs/exec.c
>> +++ b/fs/exec.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>> #include <linux/namei.h>
>> #include <linux/mount.h>
>> #include <linux/security.h>
>> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> #include <linux/tsacct_kern.h>
>> #include <linux/cn_proc.h>
>> @@ -1477,6 +1478,10 @@ static int do_execve_common(const char *filename,
>> if (retval)
>> goto out_ret;
>>
>> + retval = seccomp_check_exec();
>> + if (retval)
>> + goto out_ret;
>> +
>> retval = -ENOMEM;
>> bprm = kzalloc(sizeof(*bprm), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!bprm)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/prctl.h b/include/linux/prctl.h
>> index a3baeb2..15e2460 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/prctl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/prctl.h
>> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@
>> #define PR_GET_SECCOMP 21
>> #define PR_SET_SECCOMP 22
>>
>> +/* Set process seccomp filters */
>> +#define PR_ATTACH_SECCOMP_FILTER 36
>> +
>> /* Get/set the capability bounding set (as per security/commoncap.c) */
>> #define PR_CAPBSET_READ 23
>> #define PR_CAPBSET_DROP 24
>> diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> index cc7a4e9..99d163e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> @@ -5,9 +5,28 @@
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
>>
>> #include <linux/thread_info.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> #include <asm/seccomp.h>
>>
>> -typedef struct { int mode; } seccomp_t;
>> +struct seccomp_filter;
>> +/**
>> + * struct seccomp_struct - the state of a seccomp'ed process
>> + *
>> + * @mode:
>> + * if this is 0, seccomp is not in use.
>> + * is 1, the process is under standard seccomp rules.
>> + * is 2, the process is only allowed to make system calls where
>> + * associated filters evaluate successfully.
>> + * @filter: Metadata for filter if using CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER.
>> + * @filter must only be accessed from the context of current as there
>> + * is no guard.
>> + */
>> +typedef struct seccomp_struct {
>> + int mode;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> + struct seccomp_filter *filter;
>> +#endif
>> +} seccomp_t;
>>
>> extern void __secure_computing(int);
>> static inline void secure_computing(int this_syscall)
>> @@ -28,8 +47,7 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(seccomp_t *s)
>>
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>>
>> -typedef struct { } seccomp_t;
>> -
>> +typedef struct seccomp_struct { } seccomp_t;
>> #define secure_computing(x) do { } while (0)
>>
>> static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
>> @@ -49,4 +67,50 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(seccomp_t *s)
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP */
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> +
>> +#define seccomp_filter_init_task(_tsk) do { \
>> + (_tsk)->seccomp.filter = NULL; \
>> +} while (0);
>> +
>> +/* No locking is needed here because the task_struct will
>> + * have no parallel consumers.
>> + */
>> +#define seccomp_filter_free_task(_tsk) do { \
>> + put_seccomp_filter((_tsk)->seccomp.filter); \
>> +} while (0);
>> +
>> +extern int seccomp_check_exec(void);
>> +
>> +extern long prctl_attach_seccomp_filter(char __user *);
>> +
>> +extern struct seccomp_filter *get_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *);
>> +extern void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *);
>> +
>> +extern int seccomp_test_filters(int);
>> +extern void seccomp_filter_log_failure(int);
>> +extern void seccomp_filter_fork(struct task_struct *child,
>> + struct task_struct *parent);
>> +
>> +#else /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +
>> +struct seccomp_filter { };
>> +#define seccomp_filter_init_task(_tsk) do { } while (0);
>> +#define seccomp_filter_fork(_tsk, _orig) do { } while (0);
>> +#define seccomp_filter_free_task(_tsk) do { } while (0);
>> +
>> +static inline int seccomp_check_exec(void)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static inline long prctl_attach_seccomp_filter(char __user *a2)
>> +{
>> + return -ENOSYS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>> #endif /* _LINUX_SECCOMP_H */
>> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
>> index e898c5b..0584090 100644
>> --- a/kernel/Makefile
>> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK) += hung_task.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR) += watchdog.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS) += irq/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SECCOMP) += seccomp.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER) += seccomp_filter.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST) += rcutorture.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) += rcutree.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) += rcutree.o
>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>> index da4a6a1..cc1d628 100644
>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
>> #include <linux/security.h>
>> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> #include <linux/swap.h>
>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> @@ -166,6 +167,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>> free_thread_info(tsk->stack);
>> rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk);
>> ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
>> + seccomp_filter_free_task(tsk);
>> free_task_struct(tsk);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task);
>> @@ -1209,6 +1211,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
>> /* Perform scheduler related setup. Assign this task to a CPU. */
>> sched_fork(p);
>>
>> + seccomp_filter_init_task(p);
>> retval = perf_event_init_task(p);
>> if (retval)
>> goto bad_fork_cleanup_policy;
>> @@ -1375,6 +1378,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
>> if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)
>> threadgroup_fork_read_unlock(current);
>> perf_event_fork(p);
>> + seccomp_filter_fork(p, current);
>> return p;
>>
>> bad_fork_free_pid:
>> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
>> index 57d4b13..78719be 100644
>> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ void __secure_computing(int this_syscall)
>> return;
>> } while (*++syscall);
>> break;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> + case 2:
>> + if (seccomp_test_filters(this_syscall) == 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + seccomp_filter_log_failure(this_syscall);
>> + break;
>> +#endif
>> default:
>> BUG();
>> }
>> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp_filter.c b/kernel/seccomp_filter.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4770847
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/kernel/seccomp_filter.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,639 @@
>> +/* bpf program-based system call filtering
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors <chromium-os-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/capability.h>
>> +#include <linux/compat.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/rculist.h>
>> +#include <linux/filter.h>
>> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>> +#include <linux/kref.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/pid.h>
>> +#include <linux/prctl.h>
>> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
>> +#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
>> +#include <linux/regset.h>
>> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/user.h>
>> +
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct seccomp_filter - container for seccomp BPF programs
>> + *
>> + * @usage: reference count to manage the object lifetime.
>> + * get/put helpers should be used when accessing an instance
>> + * outside of a lifetime-guarded section. In general, this
>> + * is only needed for handling filters shared across tasks.
>> + * @creator: pointer to the pid that created this filter
>> + * @parent: pointer to the ancestor which this filter will be composed with.
>> + * @flags: provide information about filter from creation time.
>> + * @personality: personality of the process at filter creation time.
>> + * @insns: the BPF program instructions to evaluate
>> + * @count: the number of instructions in the program.
>> + *
>> + * seccomp_filter objects should never be modified after being attached
>> + * to a task_struct (other than @usage).
>> + */
>> +struct seccomp_filter {
>> + struct kref usage;
>> + struct pid *creator;
>> + struct seccomp_filter *parent;
>> + struct {
>> + uint32_t admin:1, /* can allow execve */
>> + compat:1, /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
>> + __reserved:30;
>> + } flags;
>> + int personality;
>> + unsigned short count; /* Instruction count */
>> + struct sock_filter insns[0];
>> +};
>> +
>> +static unsigned int seccomp_run_filter(const u8 *buf,
>> + const size_t buflen,
>> + const struct sock_filter *);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_filter_alloc - allocates a new filter object
>> + * @padding: size of the insns[0] array in bytes
>> + *
>> + * The @padding should be a multiple of
>> + * sizeof(struct sock_filter).
>> + *
>> + * Returns ERR_PTR on error or an allocated object.
>> + */
>> +static struct seccomp_filter *seccomp_filter_alloc(unsigned long padding)
>> +{
>> + struct seccomp_filter *f;
>> + unsigned long bpf_blocks = padding / sizeof(struct sock_filter);
>> +
>> + /* Drop oversized requests. */
>> + if (bpf_blocks == 0 || bpf_blocks > BPF_MAXINSNS)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> + /* Padding should always be in sock_filter increments. */
>> + BUG_ON(padding % sizeof(struct sock_filter));
>
> I still think the BUG_ON here is harsh given that the progsize is passed
> in by userspace. Was there a reason not to return -EINVAL here?
I've changed it in the next revision. As is, I don't believe
userspace can control
the size of padding directly, just the increment since it specifies
its length in terms
of bpf blocks (sizeof(struct sock_filter)). But EINVAL is certainly
less aggressive :)
>> +
>> + f = kzalloc(sizeof(struct seccomp_filter) + padding, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!f)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + kref_init(&f->usage);
>> + f->creator = get_task_pid(current, PIDTYPE_PID);
>> + f->count = bpf_blocks;
>> + return f;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_filter_free - frees the allocated filter.
>> + * @filter: NULL or live object to be completely destructed.
>> + */
>> +static void seccomp_filter_free(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
>> +{
>> + if (!filter)
>> + return;
>> + put_seccomp_filter(filter->parent);
>> + put_pid(filter->creator);
>> + kfree(filter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __put_seccomp_filter(struct kref *kref)
>> +{
>> + struct seccomp_filter *orig =
>> + container_of(kref, struct seccomp_filter, usage);
>> + seccomp_filter_free(orig);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void seccomp_filter_log_failure(int syscall)
>> +{
>> + pr_info("%s[%d]: system call %d blocked at 0x%lx\n",
>> + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), syscall,
>> + KSTK_EIP(current));
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* put_seccomp_filter - decrements the ref count of @orig and may free. */
>> +void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *orig)
>> +{
>> + if (!orig)
>> + return;
>> + kref_put(&orig->usage, __put_seccomp_filter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* get_seccomp_filter - increments the reference count of @orig. */
>> +struct seccomp_filter *get_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *orig)
>> +{
>> + if (!orig)
>> + return NULL;
>> + kref_get(&orig->usage);
>> + return orig;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int seccomp_check_personality(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
>> +{
>> + if (filter->personality != current->personality)
>> + return -EACCES;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> + if (filter->flags.compat != (!!(is_compat_task())))
>> + return -EACCES;
>> +#endif
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct user_regset *
>> +find_prstatus(const struct user_regset_view *view)
>> +{
>> + const struct user_regset *regset;
>> + int n;
>> +
>> + /* Skip 0. */
>> + for (n = 1; n < view->n; ++n) {
>> + regset = view->regsets + n;
>> + if (regset->core_note_type == NT_PRSTATUS)
>> + return regset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_get_regs - returns a pointer to struct user_regs_struct
>> + * @scratch: preallocated storage of size @available
>> + * @available: pointer to the size of scratch.
>> + *
>> + * Returns NULL if the registers cannot be acquired or copied.
>> + * Returns a populated pointer to @scratch by default.
>> + * Otherwise, returns a pointer to a a u8 array containing the struct
>> + * user_regs_struct appropriate for the task personality. The pointer
>> + * may be to the beginning of @scratch or to an externally managed data
>> + * structure. On success, @available should be updated with the
>> + * valid region size of the returned pointer.
>> + *
>> + * If the architecture overrides the linkage, then the pointer may pointer to
>> + * another location.
>> + */
>> +__weak u8 *seccomp_get_regs(u8 *scratch, size_t *available)
>> +{
>> + /* regset is usually returned based on task personality, not current
>> + * system call convention. This behavior makes it unsafe to execute
>> + * BPF programs over regviews if is_compat_task or the personality
>> + * have changed since the program was installed.
>> + */
>> + const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(current);
>> + const struct user_regset *regset = &view->regsets[0];
>> + size_t scratch_size = *available;
>> + if (regset->core_note_type != NT_PRSTATUS) {
>> + /* The architecture should override this method for speed. */
>> + regset = find_prstatus(view);
>> + if (!regset)
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> + *available = regset->n * regset->size;
>> + /* Make sure the scratch space isn't exceeded. */
>> + if (*available > scratch_size)
>> + *available = scratch_size;
>> + if (regset->get(current, regset, 0, *available, scratch, NULL))
>> + return NULL;
>> + return scratch;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_test_filters - tests 'current' against the given syscall
>> + * @syscall: number of the system call to test
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on ok and non-zero on error/failure.
>> + */
>> +int seccomp_test_filters(int syscall)
>> +{
>> + struct seccomp_filter *filter;
>> + u8 regs_tmp[sizeof(struct user_regs_struct)], *regs;
>> + size_t regs_size = sizeof(struct user_regs_struct);
>> + int ret = -EACCES;
>> +
>> + filter = current->seccomp.filter; /* uses task ref */
>> + if (!filter)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* All filters in the list are required to share the same system call
>> + * convention so only the first filter is ever checked.
>> + */
>> + if (seccomp_check_personality(filter))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* Grab the user_regs_struct. Normally, regs == ®s_tmp, but
>> + * that is not mandatory. E.g., it may return a point to
>> + * task_pt_regs(current). NULL checking is mandatory.
>> + */
>> + regs = seccomp_get_regs(regs_tmp, ®s_size);
>> + if (!regs)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* Only allow a system call if it is allowed in all ancestors. */
>> + ret = 0;
>> + for ( ; filter != NULL; filter = filter->parent) {
>> + /* Allowed if return value is the size of the data supplied. */
>> + if (seccomp_run_filter(regs, regs_size, filter->insns) !=
>> + regs_size)
>> + ret = -EACCES;
>> + }
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_attach_filter: Attaches a seccomp filter to current.
>> + * @fprog: BPF program to install
>> + *
>> + * Context: User context only. This function may sleep on allocation and
>> + * operates on current. current must be attempting a system call
>> + * when this is called (usually prctl).
>> + *
>> + * This function may be called repeatedly to install additional filters.
>> + * Every filter successfully installed will be evaluated (in reverse order)
>> + * for each system call the thread makes.
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on success or an errno on failure.
>> + */
>> +long seccomp_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog)
>> +{
>> + struct seccomp_filter *filter = NULL;
>> + /* Note, len is a short so overflow should be impossible. */
>> + unsigned long fp_size = fprog->len * sizeof(struct sock_filter);
>> + long ret = -EPERM;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate a new seccomp_filter */
>> + filter = seccomp_filter_alloc(fp_size);
>> + if (IS_ERR(filter)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(filter);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Lock the process personality and calling convention. */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> + if (is_compat_task())
>> + filter->flags.compat = 1;
>> +#endif
>> + filter->personality = current->personality;
>> +
>> + /* Auditing is not needed since the capability wasn't requested */
>> + if (security_real_capable_noaudit(current, current_user_ns(),
>> + CAP_SYS_ADMIN) == 0)
>> + filter->flags.admin = 1;
>> +
>> + /* Copy the instructions from fprog. */
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + if (copy_from_user(filter->insns, fprog->filter, fp_size))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* Check the fprog */
>> + ret = sk_chk_filter(filter->insns, filter->count);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* If there is an existing filter, make it the parent
>> + * and reuse the existing task-based ref.
>> + */
>> + filter->parent = current->seccomp.filter;
>> +
>> + /* Force all filters to use one system call convention. */
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + if (filter->parent) {
>> + if (filter->parent->flags.compat != filter->flags.compat)
>> + goto out;
>> + if (filter->parent->personality != filter->personality)
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Double claim the new filter so we can release it below simplifying
>> + * the error paths earlier.
>> + */
>> + ret = 0;
>> + get_seccomp_filter(filter);
>> + current->seccomp.filter = filter;
>> + /* Engage seccomp if it wasn't. This doesn't use PR_SET_SECCOMP. */
>> + if (!current->seccomp.mode) {
>> + current->seccomp.mode = 2;
>> + set_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP);
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + put_seccomp_filter(filter); /* for get or task, on err */
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +long prctl_attach_seccomp_filter(char __user *user_filter)
>> +{
>> + struct sock_fprog fprog;
>> + long ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + if (!user_filter)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&fprog, user_filter, sizeof(fprog)))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + ret = seccomp_attach_filter(&fprog);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_check_exec: determines if exec is allowed for current
>> + * Returns 0 if allowed.
>> + */
>> +int seccomp_check_exec(void)
>> +{
>> + if (current->seccomp.mode != 2)
>> + return 0;
>> + /* We can rely on the task refcount for the filter. */
>> + if (!current->seccomp.filter)
>> + return -EPERM;
>> + /* The last attached filter set for the process is checked. It must
>> + * have been installed with CAP_SYS_ADMIN capabilities.
>
> This comment is confusing. By 'It must' you mean that if not, it's
> denied. But if I didn't know better I would read that as "we can't
> get to this code unless". Can you change it to something like
> "Exec is refused unless the filter was installed with CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> privilege"?
Sounds good!
>> + */
>> + if (current->seccomp.filter->flags.admin)
>> + return 0;
>> + return -EPERM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* seccomp_filter_fork: manages inheritance on fork
>> + * @child: forkee
>> + * @parent: forker
>> + * Ensures that @child inherit a seccomp_filter iff seccomp is enabled
>> + * and the set of filters is marked as 'enabled'.
>> + */
>> +void seccomp_filter_fork(struct task_struct *child,
>> + struct task_struct *parent)
>> +{
>> + if (!parent->seccomp.mode)
>> + return;
>> + child->seccomp.mode = parent->seccomp.mode;
>> + child->seccomp.filter = get_seccomp_filter(parent->seccomp.filter);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Returns a pointer to the BPF evaluator after checking the offset and size
>> + * boundaries. The signature almost matches the signature from
>> + * net/core/filter.c with the hopes of sharing code in the future.
>> + */
>> +static const void *load_pointer(const u8 *buf, size_t buflen,
>> + int offset, size_t size,
>> + void *unused)
>> +{
>> + if (offset >= buflen)
>> + goto fail;
>> + if (offset < 0)
>> + goto fail;
>> + if (size > buflen - offset)
>> + goto fail;
>> + return buf + offset;
>> +fail:
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_run_filter - evaluate BPF (over user_regs_struct)
>> + * @buf: buffer to execute the filter over
>> + * @buflen: length of the buffer
>> + * @fentry: filter to apply
>> + *
>> + * Decode and apply filter instructions to the buffer.
>> + * Return length to keep, 0 for none. @buf is a regset we are
>> + * filtering, @filter is the array of filter instructions.
>> + * Because all jumps are guaranteed to be before last instruction,
>> + * and last instruction guaranteed to be a RET, we dont need to check
>> + * flen.
>> + *
>> + * See core/net/filter.c as this is nearly an exact copy.
>> + * At some point, it would be nice to merge them to take advantage of
>> + * optimizations (like JIT).
>> + *
>> + * A successful filter must return the full length of the data. Anything less
>> + * will currently result in a seccomp failure. In the future, it may be
>> + * possible to use that for hard filtering registers on the fly so it is
>> + * ideal for consumers to return 0 on intended failure.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned int seccomp_run_filter(const u8 *buf,
>> + const size_t buflen,
>> + const struct sock_filter *fentry)
>> +{
>> + const void *ptr;
>> + u32 A = 0; /* Accumulator */
>> + u32 X = 0; /* Index Register */
>> + u32 mem[BPF_MEMWORDS]; /* Scratch Memory Store */
>> + u32 tmp;
>> + int k;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Process array of filter instructions.
>> + */
>> + for (;; fentry++) {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
>> +#define K (fentry->k)
>> +#else
>> + const u32 K = fentry->k;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + switch (fentry->code) {
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X:
>> + A += X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K:
>> + A += K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X:
>> + A -= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K:
>> + A -= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X:
>> + A *= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K:
>> + A *= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X:
>> + if (X == 0)
>> + return 0;
>> + A /= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
>> + A = reciprocal_divide(A, K);
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X:
>> + A &= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_AND_K:
>> + A &= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_OR_X:
>> + A |= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_OR_K:
>> + A |= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X:
>> + A <<= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K:
>> + A <<= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X:
>> + A >>= X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K:
>> + A >>= K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ALU_NEG:
>> + A = -A;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JA:
>> + fentry += K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K:
>> + fentry += (A > K) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K:
>> + fentry += (A >= K) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K:
>> + fentry += (A == K) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K:
>> + fentry += (A & K) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X:
>> + fentry += (A > X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X:
>> + fentry += (A >= X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X:
>> + fentry += (A == X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X:
>> + fentry += (A & X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_W_ABS:
>> + k = K;
>> +load_w:
>> + ptr = load_pointer(buf, buflen, k, 4, &tmp);
>> + if (ptr != NULL) {
>> + /* Note, unlike on network data, values are not
>> + * byte swapped.
>> + */
>> + A = *(const u32 *)ptr;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_H_ABS:
>> + k = K;
>> +load_h:
>> + ptr = load_pointer(buf, buflen, k, 2, &tmp);
>> + if (ptr != NULL) {
>> + A = *(const u16 *)ptr;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_B_ABS:
>> + k = K;
>> +load_b:
>> + ptr = load_pointer(buf, buflen, k, 1, &tmp);
>> + if (ptr != NULL) {
>> + A = *(const u8 *)ptr;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_W_LEN:
>> + A = buflen;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN:
>> + X = buflen;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_W_IND:
>> + k = X + K;
>> + goto load_w;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_H_IND:
>> + k = X + K;
>> + goto load_h;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_B_IND:
>> + k = X + K;
>> + goto load_b;
>> + case BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH:
>> + ptr = load_pointer(buf, buflen, K, 1, &tmp);
>> + if (ptr != NULL) {
>> + X = (*(u8 *)ptr & 0xf) << 2;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_IMM:
>> + A = K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LDX_IMM:
>> + X = K;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LD_MEM:
>> + A = mem[K];
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_LDX_MEM:
>> + X = mem[K];
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_MISC_TAX:
>> + X = A;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_MISC_TXA:
>> + A = X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_RET_K:
>> + return K;
>> + case BPF_S_RET_A:
>> + return A;
>> + case BPF_S_ST:
>> + mem[K] = A;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_STX:
>> + mem[K] = X;
>> + continue;
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_PROTOCOL:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_PKTTYPE:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_IFINDEX:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_MARK:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_QUEUE:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_HATYPE:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_RXHASH:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_CPU:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_NLATTR:
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_NLATTR_NEST:
>> + /* ignored */
>> + continue;
>> + default:
>> + WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "Unknown code:%u jt:%u tf:%u k:%u\n",
>> + fentry->code, fentry->jt,
>> + fentry->jf, fentry->k);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
>> index 481611f..77f2eda 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sys.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
>> @@ -1783,6 +1783,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
>> case PR_SET_SECCOMP:
>> error = prctl_set_seccomp(arg2);
>> break;
>> + case PR_ATTACH_SECCOMP_FILTER:
>> + error = prctl_attach_seccomp_filter((char __user *)
>> + arg2);
>> + break;
>> case PR_GET_TSC:
>> error = GET_TSC_CTL(arg2);
>> break;
>> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
>> index 51bd5a0..77b1106 100644
>> --- a/security/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/Kconfig
>> @@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ config SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT
>>
>> If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
>>
>> +config SECCOMP_FILTER
>> + bool "Enable seccomp-based system call filtering"
>> + select SECCOMP
>> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL
>> + help
>> + This kernel feature expands CONFIG_SECCOMP to allow computing
>> + in environments with reduced kernel access dictated by a system
>> + call filter, expressed in BPF, installed by the application itself
>> + through prctl(2).
>> +
>> + See Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt for more detail.
>> +
>> config SECURITY
>> bool "Enable different security models"
>> depends on SYSFS
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/