RE: [PATCH V1] TPS62360: Add tps62360 regulator driver

From: Laxman Dewangan
Date: Mon Jan 09 2012 - 02:33:10 EST



> On Monday, January 09, 2012 12:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote
> > In my design, the voltage vary from 900mV to the 1300mV in increment of
> > 50mV. In this case, the voltage change request is 900, 950, 1000, 1050,
> > 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300.
> > I would like to have entry like
> > 900-950->vsel0
> > 950-1000>vsel1,
> > 1000-1050->vsel2
> > 1050-1100->vsel3
> > 1100-1150->vsel0
> > 1150-1200->vsel1
> > 1200-1250->vsel2
> > 1250->1300->vsel3
>
> Why? I'm not sure I understand this. You're asking the regulator to
> output ranges not voltages and you're setting multiple overlapping
> ranges for each VSEL.

If I fix the voltage with each VSEL then only 4 voltages will be
possible but I want to have more than 4 different output.
How do I achieve this?

>
> > Based on voltage increment requirements for a given application, this
> > table can be tune more. Now if client request for voltage setting for
> > range of 1000-1050, I will select the VSET1 for configuration, similarly
> > for 1100-1150, VSET0 will be the configuration register.
>
> This just seems like it makes the driver configuration much more
> complex and restricts the ability of the system to adapt itself to
> what's happening at runtime.
>
> What I'd expect to see is nothing but the GPIOs and their default state
> (since sadly we can't read back from output GPIOs with gpiolib) being
> specified.

I did not understand it correctly. Can you please elaborate how can we
pass the voltage with corresponding vsel?
I want to have around 10 different voltages at output.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/