Re: Please merge two small bug fix patches from linux-next

[Jesper Juhl]

On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 13:26 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Below are two patches that have been in linux-next for ages (via akpm's
> > > tree). They are prette simple, straight-up, bug fixes. They have been
> > > submitted to maintainers multiple times over (IIRC at least the past
> > > year), but for some reason the maintainers seem uninterested in picking
> > > them up (or even responding to them).
> []
> > they seem to have Andrew's sign-off, so I'd have expected them to
> > come through Andew. What's up?
> 
> >From my perspective, the issue lies with James'
> apparent desire to keep scsi tree changes as close
> to zero as possible.
> 
> Many obvious corrections to scsi defects have gone
> unapplied.
> 

I have to agree. It's actually gotten to the point that I personally 
completely avoid/ignore scsi code when looking for stuff to fix/improve 
since I don't expect to be able to get the patches merged anyway..


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/