[PATCH][trace-cmd] blk plugin: replace BLK_TC_BARRIER with BLK_TC_FLUSH/BLK_TC_FUA

From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Date: Sun Jan 08 2012 - 08:19:46 EST


The BLK_TC_BARRIER flag was dropped in Linux commit c09c47caedc in
August 2011. The blk plugin fails to build against recent kernel
headers. Since no flag bits were left, the new BLK_TC_FLUSH flag reused
the BLK_TC_BARRIER bit. The new BLK_TC_FUA flag was also added.

This patch updates fill_rwbs() to reflect the new
BLK_TC_FLUSH/BLK_TC_FUA flags. This allows plugin_blk.c to build
successfully on recent kernels. The drawback is that this breaks the
build for pre-c09c47caedc kernel headers.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
There is an alternative version of this patch with a build test in the Makefile
so that we know whether to use BLK_TC_BARRIER or BLK_TC_FLUSH/BLK_TC_FUA. That
would support both old and new kernel headers using a HAVE_BLK_TC_FLUSH #ifdef.

I wasn't able to find the right makefile shell escaping magic to get the
build-test function to work. If anyone knows how to test a snippet like the
following, then that would be nicer:

#include <linux/blktrace_api.h>
int main(void) { return BLK_TC_FLUSH; }

plugin_blk.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/plugin_blk.c b/plugin_blk.c
index 9327b17..4352cb7 100644
--- a/plugin_blk.c
+++ b/plugin_blk.c
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ static void fill_rwbs(char *rwbs, int action, unsigned int bytes)
goto out;
}

+ if (tc & BLK_TC_FLUSH)
+ rwbs[i++] = 'F';
+
if (tc & BLK_TC_DISCARD)
rwbs[i++] = 'D';
else if (tc & BLK_TC_WRITE)
@@ -63,10 +66,10 @@ static void fill_rwbs(char *rwbs, int action, unsigned int bytes)
else
rwbs[i++] = 'N';

+ if (tc & BLK_TC_FUA)
+ rwbs[i++] = 'F';
if (tc & BLK_TC_AHEAD)
rwbs[i++] = 'A';
- if (tc & BLK_TC_BARRIER)
- rwbs[i++] = 'B';
if (tc & BLK_TC_SYNC)
rwbs[i++] = 'S';
if (tc & BLK_TC_META)
--
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/