Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: initial support for sta2x11

From: Alessandro Rubini
Date: Sat Jan 07 2012 - 03:22:42 EST


> trivia:

Thanks.

> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

Ok.

> typo: s/subordindate/subordinate/

argh!

> It's probably not necessary to prefix with "sta2x11: "

fine.

>
>> + size);
>> + if (swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size))
>> + dev_emerg(&pdev->dev, "%s: init swiotlb(%i) failed\n",
>> + __func__, size);
>
> or __func__

I don't understand. No size? Or you typoed and meant pr_fmt defined above?

>> + uint32_t v[2]; /* used as a string... */
>
> less than pretty.

Sure. But it's informative. Do you prefer a union? I don't want to
do be/le stuff as it's irrelevant. But I can't read 1 byte at a time
nor use a pointer there.

thanks, will resend

/alessandro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/