Re: [resubmit] Re: [patch-final] Re: patch] cpusets, cgroups:disallow attaching kthreadd

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sat Jan 07 2012 - 01:35:05 EST


On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 14:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:36:57 +0100
> Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > cpusets, cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd
> >
> > Allowing kthreadd to be moved to a non-root group makes no sense, it being
> > a global resource, and needlessly leads unsuspecting users toward trouble.
> >
> > 1. An RT workqueue worker thread spawned in a task group with no rt_runtime
> > allocated is not schedulable. Simple user error, but harmful to the box.
> >
> > 2. A worker thread which acquires PF_THREAD_BOUND can never leave a cpuset,
> > rendering the cpuset immortal.
> >
> > Save the user some unexpected trouble, just say no.
>
> Someone's been screwing around in linux-next during the merge window.
> afacit some patch which was previously there has magically disappeared.
> That killed your patch - the original version of the
> kernel/sched/core.c chagne applies to the new linux-next but the
> kernel/cpuset.c part is all wrecked.

Hm, what to do...

I can't get to mmotm to see what's there, but fresh pulled linux-next
has it as 904655b9, and looked ok. (?) The only thing I can think to do
is post it as just plugged into fresh pulled master and hope that helps
turn little floundering guppy right side up again.

From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>

cpusets, cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd

Allowing kthreadd to be moved to a non-root group makes no sense, it being
a global resource, and needlessly leads unsuspecting users toward trouble.

1. An RT workqueue worker thread spawned in a task group with no
rt_runtime allocated is not schedulable. Simple user error, but
harmful to the box.

2. A worker thread which acquires PF_THREAD_BOUND can never leave a
cpuset, rendering the cpuset immortal.

Save the user some unexpected trouble, just say no.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 0b1712d..cf438f3 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>

/*
* Workqueue for cpuset related tasks.
@@ -1404,9 +1405,10 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
* set of allowed nodes is unnecessary. Thus, cpusets are not
* applicable for such threads. This prevents checking for success of
* set_cpus_allowed_ptr() on all attached tasks before cpus_allowed may
- * be changed.
+ * be changed. We also disallow attaching kthreadd, to prevent a child
+ * from becoming trapped should it later acquire PF_THREAD_BOUND.
*/
- if (tsk->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND)
+ if (tsk->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND || tsk == kthreadd_task)
return -EINVAL;

return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 4dbfd04..165d610 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/init_task.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>

#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
@@ -7576,6 +7577,15 @@ cpu_cgroup_can_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
if (tsk->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
return -EINVAL;
#endif
+ /*
+ * kthreadd can fork workers for an RT workqueue in a cgroup
+ * which may or may not have rt_runtime allocated. Just say no,
+ * as attaching a global resource to a non-root group doesn't
+ * make any sense anyway.
+ */
+ if (tsk == kthreadd_task)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
}



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/