Re: [PATCH 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()

From: Kalle Valo
Date: Thu Jan 05 2012 - 03:57:39 EST


On 01/05/2012 01:58 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 01:09 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> We don't need it as debug calls already have a log level and compiler
>> should be smart enough to optimise away the code when ath6kl debug code
>> is not enabled. Also it makes it easier to abstract core code to
>> ath6kl_core.ko.
>
> Changelog isn't representative of code changes.
> ATH6KL_DBG_ANY -> ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.c
> []
>> @@ -82,31 +82,31 @@ void ath6kl_dump_registers(struct ath6kl_device *dev,
>> struct ath6kl_irq_enable_reg *irq_enable_reg)
>> {
>>
>> - ath6kl_dbg(ATH6KL_DBG_ANY, ("<------- Register Table -------->\n"));
>> + ath6kl_dbg(ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ, ("<------- Register Table -------->\n"));

It's related to this change:

- if (AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK(ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ))
- ath6kl_dump_registers(dev, &dev->irq_proc_reg,
- &dev->irq_en_reg);
+ ath6kl_dump_registers(dev, &dev->irq_proc_reg,
+ &dev->irq_en_reg);

So instead of checking ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ before calling the function the
debug messages in function instead use ATH6KL_DBG_IRQ. I'll mention this
in the commit log.

I should get rid of that ATH6KL_DBG_ANY level completely, it's just
confusing. But I'll do that later.

Thank you for the review.

Kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/