Re: [PATCH] msi: fix imbalanced refcount of msi irq sysfs objects

[David Miller]

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:51:34 -0500

> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:19:52AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:53:05 -0500
>> Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:05:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> > > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2012 10:29:54 -0500
>> > > 
>> > > > This warning was recently reported to me:
>> > > 
>> > > I've hit this too, see:
>> > > 
>> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132458146927890&w=2
>> > > 
>> > > and my analysis at:
>> > > 
>> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=132458391128660&w=2
>> > > 
>> > Yup, your analysis is correct. Regardless of the why behind msi enablement
>> > failing, we need to gate the kobject_del/put in free_msi_irqs on successful
>> > completion of kobject_init_and_add in populate_msi_sysfs.  This patch does that,
>> > using the parent pointer as a flag.
>> 
>> I applied this to my -next branch; doesn't seem critical to land
>> immediately.  If you disagree let me know and I'll pull it over to my
>> for-linus branch instead.
>> 
>> Thanks,
> I'm ok with it waiting, but I'll defer to Dave and others who have seen it
> occur.  It sounds like its alot of log noise.

The bug only exists in the PCI -next code I thought.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/