[PATCH 2/3] cgroup: remove double-checking locking from attach_task_by_pid

From: Mandeep Singh Baines
Date: Thu Dec 22 2011 - 19:58:24 EST


By reading group_leader after taking the threadgroup_lock, we can
avoid the double-check locking. This removes the return of
-EAGAIN so we can cleanup cgroup_procs_write at the same time.

The suggestion was made here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/22/371

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 40 ++++++----------------------------------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 032139d..a5f7d1b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2234,9 +2234,6 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup)
ret= -ESRCH;
goto out_unlock_cgroup;
}
- /* we check later for a group_leader race with de_thread */
- if (threadgroup)
- tsk = tsk->group_leader;
/*
* even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we
* only need to check permissions on one of them.
@@ -2252,33 +2249,17 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup)
get_task_struct(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
- if (threadgroup)
- tsk = current->group_leader;
- else
- tsk = current;
+ tsk = current;
get_task_struct(tsk);
}

threadgroup_lock(tsk);
-
- if (threadgroup) {
- if (!thread_group_leader(tsk)) {
- /*
- * a race with de_thread from another thread's exec()
- * may strip us of our leadership, if this happens,
- * there is no choice but to throw this task away and
- * try again (from cgroup_procs_write); this is
- * "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking".
- */
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_unlock_threadgroup;
- }
- ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk);
- } else
+ if (threadgroup)
+ ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk->group_leader);
+ else
ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
-
-out_unlock_threadgroup:
threadgroup_unlock(tsk);
+
put_task_struct(tsk);
out_unlock_cgroup:
cgroup_unlock();
@@ -2292,16 +2273,7 @@ static int cgroup_tasks_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 pid)

static int cgroup_procs_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 tgid)
{
- int ret;
- do {
- /*
- * attach_proc fails with -EAGAIN if threadgroup leadership
- * changes in the middle of the operation, in which case we need
- * to find the task_struct for the new leader and start over.
- */
- ret = attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true);
- } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
- return ret;
+ return attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true);
}

/**
--
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/