Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Make SA_NOMASK a synonym of SA_NODEFER

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Thu Dec 22 2011 - 13:08:12 EST


On 12/21, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> Unlike other architectures, sparc currently has no SA_NODEFER
> definition but only the older SA_NOMASK. Since SA_NOMASK is the
> historical name for SA_NODEFER, add SA_NODEFER and copy what other
> architectures do by making SA_NOMASK a synonym for SA_NODEFER.

Without this patch arch/sparc can't use the new helper from 2/2

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> index e49b828..aa42fe3 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
> @@ -143,10 +143,11 @@ struct sigstack {
> #define SA_ONSTACK _SV_SSTACK
> #define SA_RESTART _SV_INTR
> #define SA_ONESHOT _SV_RESET
> -#define SA_NOMASK 0x20u
> +#define SA_NODEFER 0x20u
> #define SA_NOCLDWAIT 0x100u
> #define SA_SIGINFO 0x200u
>
> +#define SA_NOMASK SA_NODEFER
>
> #define SIG_BLOCK 0x01 /* for blocking signals */
> #define SIG_UNBLOCK 0x02 /* for unblocking signals */
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/