Re: [PATCH UPDATED 2/2] mempool: fix first round failure behavior

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Vivek.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:04:23AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> That's a good point. I did not think about module unload. I think then
> my current patch for allocating per cpu object from worker thread is buggy
> as on IO scheduler exit I don't try to flush the possibly in progress
> work[s]. 

Hmmm... I'm not sure whether backporting the mempool stuff would be a
viable approach for this merge window and -stable and we might have to
come up with some kind of minimal solution.  Don't yet know how that
should look like but let's talk about that in a different thread.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/