Re: [PATCH for-3.3] mempool: clean up and document synchronizationand memory barrier usage
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Dec 21 2011 - 11:45:08 EST
Ooh, missed something.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:37:15AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yes, that's another way to put it. It's much easier to understand if
> you draw a graph with time on x axis and curr_nr on y and mark which
> curr_nr values are guaranteed to be visible to whom. If at any point
> of time, a freeing task sees curr_nr == min_nr, it's guaranteed that
> either it's staying that way or, if not, someone else will see the
> newly decremented value.
And there will be enough "someone elses" to restore curr_nr == min_nr.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/