[tip:sched/core] sched: Fix cgroup movement of newly created process

From: tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
Date: Wed Dec 21 2011 - 06:45:29 EST


Commit-ID: 7ceff013c43c0f38f0d26c79507889c6791c0ea0
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7ceff013c43c0f38f0d26c79507889c6791c0ea0
Author: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:36:07 +0900
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:34:51 +0100

sched: Fix cgroup movement of newly created process

There is a small race between do_fork() and sched_move_task(), which is
trying to move the child.

do_fork() sched_move_task()
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
copy_process()
sched_fork()
task_fork_fair()
-> vruntime of the child is initialized
based on that of the parent.
-> we can see the child in "tasks" file now.
task_rq_lock()
task_move_group_fair()
-> child.se.vruntime
-= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
+= (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
task_rq_unlock()
wake_up_new_task()
...
enqueue_entity()
child.se.vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime

As a result, vruntime of the child becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.

This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in
task_move_group_fair(), because the vruntime has already been normalized in
task_fork_fair().

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111215143607.2ee12c5d.nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 525d69e..2d1ac6e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5338,6 +5338,19 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
* to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
* fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
*/
+ /*
+ * When !on_rq, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized.
+ * But there are some cases where it has already been normalized:
+ *
+ * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by
+ * wake_up_new_task().
+ *
+ * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta
+ * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment.
+ */
+ if (!on_rq && !p->se.sum_exec_runtime)
+ on_rq = 1;
+
if (!on_rq)
p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/