Re: [PATCH 3/7] Add assertion checking macros

[David Howells]

Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >      There is no need to display val here in the case the expression fails
> >      since it can only be 0.  If this fails, it produces an error like the
> >      following:
> >
> > 	------------[ cut here ]------------
> > 	kernel BUG at fs/fscache/main.c:109!
> > 	ASSERTION FAILED
> 
> It would be nice to display the expression here like an user space
> assert. While it can be looked up in the source it would
> make quick eyeballing easier. 
> 
> Probably wouldn't cost too much additional text size?

It can easily be made selectable.  I don't think text size should be much of
an issue - but it will also add a bunch of strings (preprocessed expressions)
to the rodata, and I'm not sure how big those can get - particularly if
they've got nested macros within (test_bit() for example).

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/