[tip:x86/autoprobe] x86, crypto: Add support for x86 cpuid auto loading for x86 crypto drivers

From: tip-bot for Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Dec 19 2011 - 20:26:43 EST


Commit-ID: 5c60702817b4b1376e633ee23acdd536cda75308
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5c60702817b4b1376e633ee23acdd536cda75308
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:46:28 -0800
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:49:32 -0800

x86, crypto: Add support for x86 cpuid auto loading for x86 crypto drivers

Add support for auto-loading of crypto drivers based on cpuid features.
This enables auto-loading of the VIA and Intel specific drivers
for AES, hashing and CRCs.

Requires the earlier infrastructure patch to add x86 modinfo.
I kept it all in a single patch for now.

I dropped the printks when the driver cpuid doesn't match (imho
drivers never should print anything in such a case)

One drawback is that udev doesn't know if the drivers are used or not,
so they will be unconditionally loaded at boot up. That's better
than not loading them at all, like it often happens.

Cc: davej@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: trenn@xxxxxxx
Cc: kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: hpa@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1324338394-4670-3-git-send-email-andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 12 +++++++++---
arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c | 11 ++++++++---
arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c | 12 ++++++++----
drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c | 9 ++++++++-
drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c | 16 ++++++++--------
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
index 545d0ce..b3350bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <crypto/aes.h>
#include <crypto/cryptd.h>
#include <crypto/ctr.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
#include <asm/aes.h>
#include <crypto/scatterwalk.h>
@@ -1253,14 +1254,19 @@ static struct crypto_alg __rfc4106_alg = {
};
#endif

+
+static const struct x86_cpu_id aesni_cpu_id[] = {
+ X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_AES),
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, aesni_cpu_id);
+
static int __init aesni_init(void)
{
int err;

- if (!cpu_has_aes) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "Intel AES-NI instructions are not detected.\n");
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(aesni_cpu_id))
return -ENODEV;
- }

if ((err = crypto_fpu_init()))
goto fpu_err;
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c b/arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c
index b9d0026..493f959 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <crypto/internal/hash.h>

#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>

#define CHKSUM_BLOCK_SIZE 1
#define CHKSUM_DIGEST_SIZE 4
@@ -173,13 +174,17 @@ static struct shash_alg alg = {
}
};

+static const struct x86_cpu_id crc32c_cpu_id[] = {
+ X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2),
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, crc32c_cpu_id);

static int __init crc32c_intel_mod_init(void)
{
- if (cpu_has_xmm4_2)
- return crypto_register_shash(&alg);
- else
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(crc32c_cpu_id))
return -ENODEV;
+ return crypto_register_shash(&alg);
}

static void __exit crc32c_intel_mod_fini(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
index 976aa64..b4bf0a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <crypto/gf128mul.h>
#include <crypto/internal/hash.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>

#define GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE 16
#define GHASH_DIGEST_SIZE 16
@@ -294,15 +295,18 @@ static struct ahash_alg ghash_async_alg = {
},
};

+static const struct x86_cpu_id pcmul_cpu_id[] = {
+ X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_PCLMULQDQ), /* Pickle-Mickle-Duck */
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, pcmul_cpu_id);
+
static int __init ghash_pclmulqdqni_mod_init(void)
{
int err;

- if (!cpu_has_pclmulqdq) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "Intel PCLMULQDQ-NI instructions are not"
- " detected.\n");
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(pcmul_cpu_id))
return -ENODEV;
- }

err = crypto_register_shash(&ghash_alg);
if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
index 29b9469..37b2e94 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
@@ -503,12 +504,18 @@ static struct crypto_alg cbc_aes_alg = {
}
};

+static struct x86_cpu_id padlock_cpu_id[] = {
+ X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_XCRYPT),
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, padlock_cpu_id);
+
static int __init padlock_init(void)
{
int ret;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);

- if (!cpu_has_xcrypt)
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(padlock_cpu_id))
return -ENODEV;

if (!cpu_has_xcrypt_enabled) {
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
index 06bdb4b..9266c0e 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>

struct padlock_sha_desc {
@@ -526,6 +527,12 @@ static struct shash_alg sha256_alg_nano = {
}
};

+static struct x86_cpu_id padlock_sha_ids[] = {
+ X86_FEATURE_MATCH(X86_FEATURE_PHE),
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, padlock_sha_ids);
+
static int __init padlock_init(void)
{
int rc = -ENODEV;
@@ -533,15 +540,8 @@ static int __init padlock_init(void)
struct shash_alg *sha1;
struct shash_alg *sha256;

- if (!cpu_has_phe) {
- printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- if (!cpu_has_phe_enabled) {
- printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "VIA PadLock detected, but not enabled. Hmm, strange...\n");
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(padlock_sha_ids) || !cpu_has_phe_enabled)
return -ENODEV;
- }

/* Register the newly added algorithm module if on *
* VIA Nano processor, or else just do as before */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/