Re: [PATCH] PREEMPT_RT_FULL: ARM context switch needs IRQs enabled

[Catalin Marinas]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:23:30PM +0000, frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 12/16/11 03:01, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:20:45AM +0000, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> ARMv6 and later have VIPT caches and the TLBs are tagged with an ASID
> >> (application specific ID). The number of ASIDs is limited to 256 and
> >> the allocation algorithm requires IPIs when all the ASIDs have been
> >> used.  The IPIs require interrupts enabled during context switch for
> >> deadlock avoidance.
> >>
> >> The RT patch mm-protect-activate-switch-mm.patch disables irqs around
> >> activate_mm() and switch_mm(), which are the portion of the ARMv6
> >> context switch that require interrupts enabled.
> >>
> >> The solution for the ARMv6 processors could be to _not_ disable irqs.
> >> A more conservative solution is to provide the same environment that
> >> the scheduler provides, that is preempt_disable().  This is more
> >> resilient for possible future changes to the ARM context switch code
> >> that is not aware of the RT patches.
> >>
> >> This patch will conflict slightly with Catalin's patch set to remove
> >> __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW, when that is accepted:
> >>
> >>    http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1111.3/01893.html
> >>
> >> When Catalin's patch set is accepted, this RT patch will need to reverse
> >> the change in patch 6 to arch/arm/include/asm/system.h:
> >>
> >>    -#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ASID
> >>    -#define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
> >>    -#endif
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The whole point of my patches was to no longer define
> > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM, so bringing it back in is not
> > feasible.
> 
> Looking over Catalin's patches again, it looks like my hacky RT patch
> will no longer be needed after Catalin's patch set is in place.  The
> problem my patch deals with is that with the RT patches applied, use_mm()
> calls switch_mm() with IRQs disabled.  The current ARM switch_mm() can
> not be called with IRQs disabled.  But with Catalin's patch 4
> (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1111.3/01898.html)
> applied, switch_mm() can be called with IRQs enabled, because
> switch_mm() no longer calls check_context() which calls __new_context()
> which calls smp_call_function() which requires IRQs to be enabled....

I don't think much has changed with my patches. The switch_mm() itself
can be called with IRQs disabled but it wouldn't even do the pgd switch
unless it is followed by a finish_arch_post_lock_switch() call (hook
introduced by my patch, but only available in sched.c).

I think you need a solution for the RT series without considering my
context switch changes. As I understand, the RT code currently calls
switch_mm() with interrupts disabled which is not supported on ARM. So
we have two solutions:

1. Change the RT patches to call switch_mm() with interrupts enabled
   (and I can modify the ARM code to cope with this scenario and do the
   pgd switch in one go).
2. Call switch_mm() with interrupts disabled but invoke an arch hook
   once the interrupts have been enabled to complete the pgd switch.

Option 1 is the only one that would work with the current ARM
switch_mm() implementation and I think it's the simplest (but I don't
know the background to the IRQs being disabled by the RT patches for the
switch_mm() call).

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/