Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use ATTR_* values from fs.h in userspacefacing structs

[Sasha Levin]

On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:47 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Look, that's the problem with exposing this stuff to protocol; you don't
> get clear semantics and are you seriously asking for trouble on kernel
> changes.  Suppose tomorrow we get rid of e.g. ATTR_KILL_PRIV; what are you
> guys going to do?  Hope that no 9p server has behaviour dependent on that
> flag being set or cleared?
> 
> Don't turn the kernel internals into a part of ABI.  And blind bulk remapping
> of constants is exactly that... 

I went with Aneesh's suggestion and did something similar to something
9p already has done before.

This is probably a good opportunity to open it up for discussion, since
I currently have a block of code containing those ATTR_* defines
copy-pasted from linux/fs.h in my userspace code, and thats obviously a
serious wtf.

-- 

Sasha.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/