Re: tty idle time and hooking inode_ops from a chardev

[Phillip Susi]

On 12/16/2011 1:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> But you said that your userspace programs are opening the wrong tty
> device for what you are trying to look at, right?

They are opening /dev/tty, which is supposed to be an alias for the 
process's controlling tty, but it isn't quite so.  It routes read/write 
calls to the correct tty, but is a separate inode, so has its own 
timestamps.

> That's not "fixing" it at all, adding an ioctl is the same as adding a
> new system call, do you really think that is ok here?

I would prefer not to, which is why I'm trying to figure out how to make 
the atime correct no matter how you opened the tty.

> As you are opening the tty node once, that's when atime is set, right?
> The fact that you keep it open still keeps the atime to the original
> open time, you aren't supposed to check for every single read/write of
> the node once it was opened.

tty_io.c updates the atime of the inode on every successful read(), and 
the mtime on every successful write().  The problem is that several 
different inodes can all point to the same tty, so which inode gets 
updated depends on which process is doing the IO.

> But to be sure, what does POSIX say about this?

No clue.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/