Re: [PATCH 1/6] HWPOISON: clean up memory_failure() vs.__memory_failure()

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Dec 16 2011 - 03:17:40 EST


On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:48:12AM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> There is only one caller of memory_failure(), all other users call
> __memory_failure() and pass in the flags argument explicitly. The
> lone user of memory_failure() will soon need to pass flags too.
>
> Add flags argument to the callsite in mce.c. Delete the old memory_failure()
> function, and then rename __memory_failure() without the leading "__".
>
> Provide clearer message when action optional memory errors are ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>

ACK.

Thanks.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/