Re: v6: faster tree-based sysctl implementation

[Eric W. Biederman]

Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You can ask Stephen Rothwell to include your tree in next.
>> git://github.com/luciang/linux-2.6-new-sysctl.git Âv6-new-sysctl-alg
>
>
> Thank you Anca, but I don't want to pollute Stephen's linux-next tree ATM.
> I'd wait until a maintainer chimes in and agrees that this approach is
> sound.

Which is my cue to say that I am behind the power curve in reviewing
this.  I will see if I can get to this before the end of the week.

Doing this and getting it right is definitely something we need to do.

We do need to be careful so that the code we wind up with is not just
faster but more maintainable than what we have today.

Thanks for still pushing this,

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/