Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driverbecause of worrying about possible misusage?

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:01:43PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 06.12.2011 12:21, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:41:38PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:

> >> Are you serious? Lower networking layers should be transparent to the
> >> upper layers. You don't implement VPN or say TCP in all of your
> >> applications, do you? These are just some more made-up arguments which
> >> don't have anything to do with the use cases I explained earlier.

> > For real time applications it does make a big difference - decisions
> > taken at the application level can greatly impact end application
> > performance.  For example with VoIP on a LAN you can get great audio

> Can you please explain how this relates to the topic we're discussing?

Your assertatation that applications should ignore the underlying
transport (which seems to be a big part of what you're saying) isn't
entirely in line with reality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/