Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma/ep93xx_dma: fix initialization of M2M controlregister

From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Tue Dec 06 2011 - 06:59:25 EST


On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:18:29AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 12:54 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > From: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Setting the flags in case of IDE didn't have any effect since the control
> > register is overwritten few lines below. So move these to be after the control
> > register is initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Applied both, Thanks
>
> I got a trivial merge conflict on both patches as I think these patches
> were of made on top of dma_slave_direction changes we did sometime back.
>
> So please do check if merges were right...

Looks right to me. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/