Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

From: Markus Trippelsdorf
Date: Mon Dec 05 2011 - 14:27:06 EST


On 2011.12.05 at 14:11 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:15:49PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2011.12.05 at 12:10 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:02:00AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > On 2011.12.03 at 14:31 -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > > > > <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On 2011.12.03 at 12:20 +0000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > > > FIX idr_layer_cache: Marking all objects used
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Yesterday I couldn't reproduce the issue at all. But today I've hit
> > > > > >> >> > > > exactly the same spot again. (CCing the drm list)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If I had to guess it looks like 0 is getting written back to some
> > > > > >> random page by the GPU maybe, it could be that the GPU is in some half
> > > > > >> setup state at boot or on a reboot does it happen from a cold boot or
> > > > > >> just warm boot or kexec?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only happened with kexec thus far. Cold boot seems to be fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you add radeon.no_wb=1 to your kexec kernel paramater an see if
> > > > > you can reproduce.
> > > >
> > > > No, I cannot reproduce the issue with radeon.no_wb=1. (I write this
> > > > after 700 successful kexec iterations...)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you try if attached patch fix the issue when you don't pass the
> > > radeon.no_wb=1 option ?
> >
> > Yes the patch finally fixes the issue for me (tested with 120 kexec
> > iterations).
> > Thanks Jerome!
> >
> > --
> > Markus
>
> Can you do a kick run on the modified patch ?

This one is also OK after ~60 iterations.

--
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/