Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM / Docs: Recommend the use of[un]lock_system_sleep() over mutex_[un]lock(&pm_mutex)

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:38PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't get what you meant here. Are you talking about what
> needs to be added/changed in the documentation or, are you referring
> to the code itself and are saying that we must make these APIs
> internal to the PM alone?

Ooh, sorry about not being clear.  I meant pm_mutex itself.  There's
no reason to expose that outside of pm, right?  And in the
documentation, we can just require use of the APIs instead of pm_mutex
itself.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/