Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[],take 2

[Tejun Heo]

(cc'ing Stephen, hi!)

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the
> > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too.  Thankfully, benh pinged
> > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed
> > version.
> 
> A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if 
> that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock 
> if there are no objections from anyone.
> 
> It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are 
> affecting non-x86 architectures, right?

Hmmm... this was part of the memblock updates going through
x86/memblock and unless we're gonna setup a separate tree for memblock
(I don't think that would be necessary at this point) I think it would
be better to route this x86/memblock eventually.  That said, setting
up temp linux-next branch for now sounds fine to me.  hpa, what do you
think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/