Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes
> sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups.
> Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC
> specific.

True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data
and passed in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead?
That is probably where it belongs today.

I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF,
but that is because they only have one single board variant.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/