Re: [SCSI] NULL pointer dereference in sym53c8xx (bisected)

From: Steffen Maier
Date: Sat Dec 03 2011 - 16:08:11 EST


On 12/02/2011 04:26 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
After upstream commit 4e6c82b3614a18740ef63109d58743a359266daf ([SCSI]
fix WARNING: at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1704), which is also included in
3.0-stable and 3.1-stable kernels, the kernel fails to boot (NULL
pointer dereference in sym53c8xx_slave_destroy).

Bug report at the Gentoo Bugzilla (reported and bisected by Martin von
Gagern). [1] (stack trace [2])

I think that the problem is that (after commit 4e6c82b)
__scsi_remove_device() is called if slave_alloc() in scsi_alloc_sdev()
fails. But __scsi_remove_device() calls slave_destroy(), which (I think)
doesn't make much sense (ie to call slave_destroy() when slave_alloc()
fails).

For sym53c8xx, this results in a NULL pointer dereference (struct
sym_lcb pointer) in slave_destroy().

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392567
[2] https://392567.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=294381

To me this looks like the same thing we encountered in the zfcp LLD:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55575.html
James explained the pairing of slave_alloc and slave_destroy even if slave_alloc returned early in which case slave_destroy needs to cope with that:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55449.html

HTH
Steffen

Linux on System z Development

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
GeschÃftsfÃhrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: BÃblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/