Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs

[Patrick McHardy]

On 02.12.2011 03:33, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
>>>> percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
>>>> for further code clean up.
>>>>
>>>> And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
>>>> performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c |   12 ++++++------
>>>>  net/socket.c           |    4 ++--
>>>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>
>> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? 
> 
> Kaber, David: 
> I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a
> favor? 

No objections from me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/