Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] clk: export tree topology and clk data via sysfs

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Wed Nov 23 2011 - 14:19:46 EST


* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [111123 10:34]:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:55:19AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [111123 09:31]:
>
> > > Keep the clk API as a fundamental thing which should be initialized early
> > > so we don't have to invent new clk APIs to get around its unavailability.
>
> > What else are you aware of that is really needed early for clocks other
> > than clockevent?
>
> If nothing else we'd have to resolve all the device probe ordering
> issues (Grant's patches seem a bit stalled) and convert all the systems
> using the API to handle deferring probes until their clocks appear.
> Using an early initcall of some kind would help with that but it does
> seem like a lot of trouble and I'd expect it'll end up getting forced in
> on most systems anyway.

Yes the ordering depends on the system. In any case, initcalls are
not super early compared to setup_timer.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/