Re: [PATCH] block: initialize request_queue's numa node duringallocation

[Vivek Goyal]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:19:58PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:

[..]
> > Storing q->node info at queue allocation time makes sense to me. In fact
> > it might make sense to clean it up from blk_init_allocated_queue_node
> > and assume that passed queue has queue->node set at the allocation time.
> >
> > CCing Mike Snitzer who introduced blk_init_allocated_queue_node(). Mike
> > what do you think. I am not sure it makes sense to pass in nodeid, both
> > at queue allocation and queue initialization time. To me, it should make
> > more sense to allocate the queue at one node and that becomes the default
> > node for reset of the initialization.
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense to me too:
> 
> From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: block: initialize request_queue's numa node during allocation
> 
> Set request_queue's node in blk_alloc_queue_node() rather than
> blk_init_allocated_queue_node().  This avoids blk_throtl_init() using
> q->node before it is initialized.
> 
> Rename blk_init_allocated_queue_node() to blk_init_allocated_queue().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Mike. Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/