Re: pull request: wireless 2011-11-22

[David Miller]

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:56:55 -0500

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:35:05 -0500
>> 
>> > Here is the latest batch of fixes intended for 3.2.  This includes a
>> > correction for a user-visible error in mac80211's debugfs info, a fix
>> > for a potential memory corrupter in prism54, an endian fix for rt2x00,
>> > an endian fix for mac80211, a fix for a NULL derefernce in cfg80211, a
>> > locking fix and a deadlock fix for p54spi, and a pair of rt2x00 fixes
>> > for handling some spurious interrupts that hardware can generate.
>> > 
>> > Please let me know if there are problems!
>> 
>> The rt2800pci change doesn't look correct.
>> 
>> If the IRQ line is shared with another device, this change will make it
>> never see interrupts.  Once you say "IRQ_HANDLED" the IRQ dispatch
>> stops processing the interrupt handler list.
> 
> I thought this at first as well.  But looking at the code in
> kernel/irq/handle.c doesn't support that conclusion.  In fact, every
> handler gets invoked no matter what they all return.  All of the irq
> handler return values are ORed together and passed to note_interrupt.
> Only if every irq handler returns IRQ_NONE does the code in
> kernel/irq/spurious.c start getting involved.
> 
> Anyway, this seems to be safe even for shared interrupts.  That said,
> this is a bit ugly.  But it makes a serious difference in performance
> for those afflicted with this issue.

It just means that we won't notice spurious interrupts if the device
sharing the line with rt2800pci generates one.

This change is wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/