Re: [PATCH 3/5] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting onsub-page writes

From: Wu Fengguang
Date: Tue Nov 22 2011 - 07:30:11 EST


> > @@ -1743,6 +1738,8 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *p
> > __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
> > task_dirty_inc(current);
> > task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> > + current->nr_dirtied++;
> > + __get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits)++;
> I think you need preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() pair around
> __get_cpu_var(). Otherwise a process could get rescheduled in the middle of
> read-modify-write cycle...

Hmm, I'm not worried about it at all, because bdp_ratelimits don't
need to be accurate. In normal cases it won't even trigger one single
call to balance_dirty_pages().

btw, account_page_dirtied() is called inside spinlock, will it be
sufficient?

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/