Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Subject    : [3.1 REGRESSION] Commit 5cec93c216db77c45f7ce970d46283bcb1933884 breaks the Chromium seccomp sandbox
>>> Submitter  : Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date       : 2011-11-14 0:40
>>> Message-ID : 8762inleno.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132123396226377&w=2
>>

This is apparently fixed in seccompsandbox.  See:

https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/issues/detail?id=17
https://code.google.com/p/seccompsandbox/source/detail?r=178

Unless someone objects, I'll consider this to not be a kernel
regression worth fixing.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/