Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs

From: Alex,Shi
Date: Mon Nov 21 2011 - 04:01:11 EST


On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 Ã 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a Ãcrit :
> > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
> > for further code clean up.
> >
> > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
> > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------
> > net/socket.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks !

Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this?
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/