Re: [patch 1/6] sched: use rt.nr_cpus_allowed to recoverselect_task_rq() cycles

[Mike Galbraith]

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 16:17 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >  kernel/sched_fair.c |    3 +++
> >  kernel/sched_rt.c   |    3 +++
> 
> I hate to be the bringer of bad news, but you're going to have to respin
> all this, these files no longer exist ;-)

No biggie, will do.

I'm just showing what was in the kernel to go with the numbers.

The nohz thing I dislike, but the problem isn't going away.  Don't like
the select_idle_sibling() ratelimit as is either, but I don't have a
better solution to this two faced little bugger.

> Please update your tip/master.

Yeah, these were master branch.  Was twiddling stable as usual first, as
you then don't have to worry about stuff changing (especially unrelated
stuff that still affects you) day to day, and munging results.

> Also, < 2 ? nr_cpus_allowed being 0 is somewhat of a problem, so the
> only remaining option is == 1.

True, but see select_task_rq_rt() :)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/