Re: [PATCH 5/7] regmap: Check if a register is writable instead ofreadable in regcache_read

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:15:31PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 06:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We should at least check that we actually have a cached value there -
> > the cache is sparse after all.

> That's what the cache already does today, you recently change the rbtree
> implementation to return -ENOENT if there is no cached value.

Oh, sorry -  this is in the cache specific code isn't it?  In that case
yes the check is just totally redundant and can be removed on those
grounds alone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/