[PATCH REPOST] genirq: don't allow per cpu interrupts to be suspended

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Wed Nov 16 2011 - 07:27:40 EST


The power management functions related to interrupts do not know
(yet) about per-cpu interrupts and end up calling the wrong
low-level methods to enable/disable interrupts.

This leads to all kind of interesting issues (action taken on one
CPU only, updating a refcount which is not used otherwise...).

The workaround for the time being is simply to flag these interrupts
with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND. At least on ARM, these interrupts are actually
dealt with at the architecture level.

Reported-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 63c1625..6e04134 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ int request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
return -ENOMEM;

action->handler = handler;
- action->flags = IRQF_PERCPU;
+ action->flags = IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
action->name = devname;
action->percpu_dev_id = dev_id;

--
1.7.0.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/