Re: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't workas it should

[Yong Zhang]

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:29:23PM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > On Oct 31, 2011, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:57:12 +0000 (GMT)
> > "Artem S. Tashkinov" wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > It's known that if you want to reach maximum performance on HT
> > > enabled Intel CPUs you should distribute the load evenly between
> > > physical cores, and when you have loaded all of them you should then
> > > load the remaining virtual cores.
> >
> > this is a bold statement, and patently false if you have to threads of
> > one process that heavily share data between eachother...
> > (but true for more independent workloads)
> 
> In my initial message I was talking about completely unrelated tasks/
> processes which share no data/instructions/whatever else. You don't
> need to trust my test case as you can carry out this test on your own.

(Cc'ing more people)

Maybe you can also show your test case here?

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/