Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size

From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Date: Fri Oct 14 2011 - 01:48:08 EST


On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:42:44 +0200, Markus Rechberger said:

> The inflexible device which uses 24064 bytes works with all other
> Operating systems by using that value
> and gives exactly the same results with other transfer sizes than that.

-ENOPARSE. If it's inflexible, how did you get results for other transfer
sizes? And if other transfer sizes give exactly the same results, why can't you
just use those instead?

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature